South Carolina Environmental Law Project

Lawyers for the Wild Side of South Carolina

SCELP in the Press

Thirsty mega-farms siphon S.C.’s rivers as state watches
April 26th, 2017


During the summer of 2015, a national potato grower pumped more than 1 billion gallons of water from a small river onto the large crop farm it had recently opened in South Carolina.

The irrigation effort kept potatoes alive and growing in the hot, dry weather – but it also did what many people feared: The Walther Farms irrigation pipe lowered water levels in the South Fork of the Edisto River, the S.C. Department of Natural Resources says.

From May through July, the amount of water flowing near the pipe dropped an average of 7 percent, according to river data analyzed this year by the DNR’s water division. And on some days, river flows might have dropped as much as 12 percent, the DNR says.

How billions of gallons of ground water are pumped from the aquifer by megafarms in South Carolina

The findings are among the first to show how the potato farm has affected the South Fork – and they are adding fuel to arguments for a crackdown on river irrigation by big crop growers across South Carolina.

An array of interests, from Blue Ridge Mountain kayakers to Pee Dee landowners, say South Carolina should tighten its water law before industrial-scale agriculture siphons too much water from rivers. In some cases, rivers supply drinking water. In others, they provide water that small farmers need. And almost all have fish and wildlife that draw recreational users on weekends.

The DNR’s findings “support concerns we have for this basically unregulated use of rivers,’’ said Rep. James Smith, D-Richland, who has introduced legislation to tighten state oversight of mega-farm withdrawals. “It shows that (river irrigation) is having a negative impact. I’m concerned that without us taking action, it’ll just get worse.’’

Walther Farms executive Jeremy Walther questioned the DNR’s findings, saying he’d heard nothing about any problems his company had caused on the river from irrigation.

But there’s little question the state doesn’t look as carefully at farm withdrawals as it does other types.

South Carolina law is filled with exemptions for agriculture that, among other things, grant qualifying farms the use of the state’s rivers forever.

Unlike industries, commercial farms don’t need to show how their water use will affect downstream crop growers, wildlife or people in other states. They can pull water from rivers without telling the public. And if a farm wants to increase the amount it takes for irrigation, it undergoes only a superficial review by state regulators.

The state relies on a mathematical formula in deciding whether to approve major farm withdrawals. The method, however, does not always take into account how a withdrawal will affect rivers at times of the year when water levels are naturally low, DNR officials say. As a result, state regulators can allocate more water for irrigation than actually is moving through a river channel, critics say.

South Carolina’s water law has so many breaks for large-scale agriculture that residents of Greenville, Bamberg and Darlington counties have filed suit in an attempt to throw out the exemptions. The matter is now before the S.C. Supreme Court, and a decision could come at any time.

Lawyer Amy Armstrong said the case results from problems highlighted in the Edisto River basin. Out-of-state farm corporations have acquired about 10,000 acres in the basin and converted forested land to expansive vegetable fields during the past four years.

“The people in the Edisto basin have been aware of what happens when there is not enough water flowing,’’ Armstrong said.

In the Edisto basin, much of the concern focuses on how big farms affect small farms that also irrigate with river water, as well as people downstream who fish and kayak. The South Fork of the Edisto, where the farms are located, drains into the main channel of the Edisto and through the ACE Basin nature preserve.

The main stem of the Edisto River also has at least one drinking water intake that supplements the Charleston water system. No problems have been noticed so far, but Charleston officials are watching what happens upriver.

Smith’s bill, introduced last month with little fanfare, attempts to tighten the rules on major agricultural withdrawals. The bill requires farms withdrawing 3 million gallons or more per month to get permits, just like industries must obtain. That would require tighter scrutiny by state regulators before they decide on a major farm withdrawal. The public would also receive notice when a big farm seeks a river withdrawal permit.

Irrigation hot spot

Lax regulation of farms is a big issue for some people who live in the upper Edisto River basin. That’s where Tom Tyler’s ancestors settled in the 1600s.

Tyler, 74, owns 1,400 acres, with much of the land on small streams that drain into the South Fork of the Edisto. He has in the past used the land for quail hunting, but Tyler also farms cattle on some of the property. These days, he uses his property to access streams so he can fish in the dark, tea-colored water.

In his view, industrial-scale farms threaten water supplies for others who rely on the South Fork.

“I don’t think you need to sacrifice everybody else – particularly those on that little tiny South Edisto River – for just a few,’’ Tyler said. “It’s going to have to be addressed sooner or later. (Mega-farm boosters) just don’t want to admit that there’s a problem.’’

Walther Farms, the Michigan corporation that has opened two expansive potato farms since 2013, is by no means the only crop-grower that relies on river water to irrigate its fields in the Edisto River basin. More than half of the 10 billion gallons withdrawn statewide annually from S.C. lakes, ponds and rivers come from the Edisto basin..

But Walther is among the thirstiest of farms, records show. The company’s potato fields near Windsor ranked fourth in the state in the amount of surface water used for irrigation in 2015, according to the Department of Health and Environmental Control. Surface water includes rivers, ponds and lakes.

Walther siphoned about 1 billion gallons from the South Fork that year. Titan Farms, a peach-growing giant that arrived in the Edgefield area more than 15 years ago, withdrew about 1.7 billion gallons of surface water in 2015. A Titan official said most of that was from storage ponds, not from rivers.

Questions about using rivers to supply large crop farms are heightened by data showing that surface water irrigation is on the rise in the Edisto River basin.

Surface water withdrawals by agriculture jumped 30 percent in the area from 2010 to 2015, DHEC said in response to questions from The State.

Scott Harder, a hydrologist with the DNR, said there’s little doubt Walther Farms’ irrigation pipe affected the South Fork in 2015. The question is whether the 7 percent drop in flows during the summer of 2015 hurt the river — and if so, how.

He said farms will almost always reduce flow in the summer. “It’s just going to vary in magnitude depending on whether it’s a wet or dry summer,’’ Harder said of Walther.

While the impacts on fish and wildlife aren’t fully known, his agency has said in the past it was worried about how the Walther withdrawals would affect aquatic species. A Dec. 15, 2013, draft letter from the DNR to DHEC said the Walther withdrawal could disrupt the spawning of shad, herring and sturgeon, while degrading the cool water habitat striped bass thrive in. The draft letter said the Walther Farms withdrawal could remove one-quarter of the river’s flow during droughts.

In addition to Walther, DHEC also has approved other withdrawals in the Edisto basin during the past four years. One of the largest agricultural withdrawals, aside from Walther’s, is a 1 billion gallon plan the agency authorized from a tiny tributary of the Edisto’s South Fork near the town of Springfield.

DHEC approved that plan in June 2016. Adjacent land was then cleared, and about 300 acres sold to FPI Properties of Colorado last month. FPI officials said the land would be farmed. RRR Farms, a South Carolina company that sold the property to FPI, was unavailable for comment to discuss the FPI sale.

Wagener auto parts dealer Doug Busbee, an outdoorsman who has become one of the area’s most outspoken proponents of a tighter water law, said the FPI purchase shows him national investment companies are interested in South Carolina farmland because of the state’s water, which costs nothing to use. Unlike Walther and the Woody agribusiness group, both of which are farming the land in the area, FPI buys farmland and rents it out. The company owns land across the country, including about 13,000 acres in South Carolina.

“You’ve got a public trust resource being traded for profit,’’ Busbee said.

‘Different league’ of farm

Jeremy Walther, who runs Walther’s potato farm in South Carolina, emphasized his operation isn’t the only one in the basin that irrigates. But he said people should not be concerned about his farm.

Walther Farms uses water only when it needs it, he said. Walther said he’s unaware of any verifiable problems in the river, despite the recent DNR calculations that river flows had dropped 7 percent near his company’s irrigation pipe.

“In the last four years, no one has mentioned the river dropping,’’ Walther said.

The S.C. Farm Bureau also downplayed concerns about large farms drawing down rivers. Farmers are responsible users of water who have no interest in depleting rivers, a top official said.

“We are not just out there dumping water willy-nilly,’’ Farm Bureau President Harry Ott said. “We are only doing it when we absolutely need to.”

That’s why South Carolina should step carefully before tightening the law on river irrigation, the bureau says. South Carolina rivers appear to be healthy, the bureau says.

“Since 2010, we’ve had some pretty extreme weather events, and there has been no negative impact on any river system where we have water withdrawals taking place,’’ Ott said. “To anticipate something in the future that may or may not happen, I would not just open the book that wide open.’’

Part of the reason South Carolina hasn’t addressed changing the 2010 water law is simple: momentum for change was hurt by a record flood in the fall of 2015 and Hurricane Matthew in the fall of 2016. Concerns about water drying up became less urgent because of flooding.

But the S.C. Farm Bureau also has played a role. The Farm Bureau, which has spent about $1 million lobbying the Legislature since 2009, has forcefully opposed efforts to tighten controls on farm withdrawals.

Agriculture officials say the state should be cautious about a crackdown because farms supply food. Excessive regulation could hinder that effort, they say.

Agribusiness, which includes food processors, has a total economic impact on South Carolina of $41.7 billion and provides more than 200,000 jobs, according to the state Department of Agriculture.

For now, DHEC, the Farm Bureau and the Department of Natural Resources are awaiting a major river basin report they say will provide more details on how – or whether – to tighten control of farms that take billions of gallons of river water each year.

How that would influence any decisions to tighten the state’s river irrigation rules is unknown. But the DNR continues to express reservations about the 2010 law.

“We were the last entity standing with concerns,’’ Ken Rentiers, a deputy chief at DNR, said in a recent interview. “Those (concerns) haven’t really changed.’’

DHEC, which approves farm withdrawals, hardly looks at environmental impacts in making its decision, nor does the department consult with the natural resources agency, DNR records show. DHEC’s decision to approve the Walther Farms irrigation project is a good example, according to a Dec. 15, 2013, draft memo by Rentiers.

“Walther Farms represents a different league of agricultural water use in our state, equivalent to the use of an electrical power plant or large municipal water supply,’’ Rentiers wrote. “The magnitude of this withdrawal, particularly in context of the small stream from which it is to be taken, presents a situation that should undergo a public review and consultation process.’’

Read more here:

Source (external link)


Environment: Appeals Court says church must preserve wetland
Posted: Mar 23, 2017
Listen to science about shoreline protection
Posted: Mar 16, 2017
DHEC board: Experimental sea walls can stay up another year
Posted: Mar 13, 2017
Upstate Forever appeals gas pipeline approval
Posted: Mar 10, 2017
DHEC board spurns staff, allows use of controversial seawalls
Posted: Mar 9, 2017
South Carolina regulators allow temporary sea walls to remain on Isle of Palms beaches
Posted: Mar 9, 2017
Upstate Forever appeals natural gas pipeline decision
Posted: Mar 8, 2017
Horry County gives OK to begin final stage of International Drive construction
Posted: Mar 7, 2017
S.C. Congressman introduces 'Loser Pays' bill targeting Clean Water Act lawsuits
Posted: Mar 6, 2017
'Loser Pays' bill introduced, addresses lawsuits against infrastructure projects
Posted: Feb 23, 2017
SC bill would limit automatic stays, environmental groups not happy
Posted: Feb 9, 2017
Dominion pipeline wins approval
Posted: Feb 3, 2017
Laurens Co. seeks to block eminent domain for Upstate pipeline construction
Posted: Jan 24, 2017
Appeals court: International Drive construction can continue
Posted: Jan 20, 2017
Charleston cruise ship terminal fight back on appeals court docket
Posted: Jan 16, 2017
Natural gas pipeline causes stink with Upstate environmental groups
Posted: Jan 3, 2017
Pipeline Battle Is Heating Up
Posted: Jan 2, 2017
Proposed pipeline sparks outrage
Posted: Jan 1, 2017
Horry County delays bidding process for International Drive after court order
Posted: Dec 22, 2016
Court order halts work on International Drive, county stops soliciting bids
Posted: Dec 21, 2016
Court order forces Horry County to stop International Drive construction yet again
Posted: Dec 20, 2016
Will International Drive be road to nowhere? This court will decide.
Posted: Dec 12, 2016
Posted: Dec 12, 2016
DHEC says no to Wild Dunes sea walls as groups sue to bring them down
Posted: Dec 10, 2016
Conservationists appeal judge's decision in International Drive case
Posted: Dec 9, 2016
Conservation groups sue over experimental seawalls along parts of eroding SC coast
Posted: Dec 7, 2016
A WALK ON THE 'WILD SIDE' - Fundraiser benefits South Carolina Environmental Law Project
Posted: Nov 10, 2016
Michael Corley To Lead Environmental Law Project’s Expansion
Posted: Oct 28, 2016
Environment: Libel suit prompted by road project goes to federal court
Posted: Oct 20, 2016
SCELP opens Greenville office to fight environmental harm
Posted: Oct 19, 2016
International Drive supporter sued by environmental lawyer
Posted: Sep 23, 2016
Environmental group files appeal in International Drive project
Posted: Aug 24, 2016
Sandbag rules changed Bonding now required
Posted: Aug 17, 2016
Film highlights dangers of man-made ocean noise
Posted: Aug 17, 2016
Environment: Drilling foes look to the future after winning award
Posted: Jul 28, 2016
Environmentalist group files motion that could delay International Drive project
Posted: Jul 15, 2016
“Erosion stops” removal ordered; DHEC considers them harmful to sea turtles
Posted: Jul 13, 2016
Court Approves Road through Prime Bear Habitat Along the Coast
Posted: Jul 8, 2016
Turtle-blocking seawall coming down
Posted: Jul 7, 2016
Community wants Palmetto Railways to up mitigation plans
Posted: Jun 29, 2016
Erosion control sea walls spur complaints from sea turtle nesting monitors
Posted: Jun 28, 2016
Sea turtles suffer as seawalls go up, legal notice says
Posted: Jun 17, 2016
Access eroding to embattled Kiawah spit, study says
Posted: May 29, 2016
Speakers show support for proposed cargo rail yard, with some caveats
Posted: May 24, 2016
Obscure Pappy’s Island the future of Cape Romain refuge
Posted: Apr 24, 2016
No oil drilling, no testing offshore S.C.
Posted: Apr 3, 2016
Offshore seismic testing push continues despite oil drilling ban
Posted: Mar 29, 2016
Cape Romain Refuge Island, ecological treasure, saved from development
Posted: Mar 29, 2016
Capt. Sam’s Spit road gets court go-ahead; conservation groups plan to appeal
Posted: Mar 23, 2016
International Drive hearings conclude, but final outcome won’t come quickly
Posted: Mar 16, 2016
Legislator pressured DNR to approve road without protections for black bears, attorney says
Posted: Feb 18, 2016
Coastal Bear Dispute Reaches Columbia Courtroom
Posted: Feb 16, 2016
Millions more recommended to protect Lake Marion from toxic waste dump
Posted: Jan 11, 2016
Court ruling uncertain on Capt. Sam’s Spit wall
Posted: Dec 5, 2015
Opinion: Don’t sacrifice coast for developers
Posted: Dec 3, 2015
Lawmakers OK change to help development on Kiawah Island
Posted: Dec 2, 2015
Kiawah Island project wins support from lawmakers
Posted: Dec 1, 2015
Battle over Captain Sam’s Spit grows as coastline shrinks
Posted: Nov 19, 2015
Capt. Sam’s Spit wall given go ahead
Posted: Nov 9, 2015
South Carolina Flooding: Real Estate Boom At Risk As Threats From Climate Change Intensify
Posted: Oct 6, 2015
Court blasts DHEC for failures at nuclear waste dump
Posted: Aug 19, 2015
Bears to get no help crossing this SC coastal road
Posted: Aug 1, 2015
Hotly contested seawall in upscale community sails toward reality near Myrtle Beach
Posted: Jul 27, 2015
Opinion: International Drive in Carolina Forest held up when Horry County reneged on its promise
Posted: Jul 22, 2015
Opinion: Tom Rice ill-informed about International Drive in Carolina Forest
Posted: Jul 20, 2015
Conservation, wildlife request on International Drive could delay Horry County road project even longer
Posted: Jul 13, 2015
Beaufort continues battle against offshore seismic testing for oil
Posted: Jul 8, 2015
Opinion: Lack of enforcement puts SC's valuable natural resources at risk
Posted: Jul 7, 2015
DHEC board lets seismic testing for oil stand
Posted: Jun 11, 2015
Kiawah developers win new permit for Captain Sam’s Spit
Posted: May 26, 2015
Marine life threatened by search for oil and gas, legal appeal says
Posted: May 18, 2015
Landfill lawsuit pits waste against wetlands
Posted: Apr 20, 2015
Expansion of towering mega dump near acclaimed nature preserve sparks dispute
Posted: Apr 17, 2015
USC School of Law announces 2015 Compleat Lawyer Award recipients
Posted: Apr 4, 2015
The new battle for Capt. Sam’s Spit; beach setback rule contested
Posted: Mar 25, 2015
S.C. lawmakers struggle to stop seaward push
Posted: Mar 19, 2015
Opinion: Don’t limit a citizen’s ability to challenge government
Posted: Mar 17, 2015
Environment: Judge rules for church in wetlands permit appeal
Posted: Feb 27, 2015
Kiawah developers seek help from Legislature to build on barrier island
Posted: Jan 29, 2015
Judge denies landowners’ motion to stop withdrawals in Edisto River ‘water war’
Posted: Jan 15, 2015
Charleston Court will hear case on S.C. water laws, draws interest of Wagener residents
Posted: Jan 14, 2015
Court rules against disputed Kiawah beach project
Posted: Dec 11, 2014
Kiawah developer denied permits for Capt. Sams Spit sea walls
Posted: Dec 10, 2014
SC attorney general fights federal environmental rules
Posted: Oct 16, 2014
Formal appeal is filed in Charleston cruise ship terminal dispute
Posted: Oct 15, 2014
Lab Test Indicates Jellyfish Plant Discharge is Harmful, Company Disagrees
Posted: Sep 7, 2014
South Carolina Ports again seek cruise terminal permit
Posted: Aug 16, 2014
Court rules against Barnwell nuclear waste dump
Posted: Jul 31, 2014
SC Senate tacks on seawall exemption to resolution
Posted: May 20, 2014
SCELP Board Member John Mark Dean's Letter to the Editor: Seawalls steal from the many to protect the few
Posted: May 14, 2014
SC beach dispute heats up
Posted: May 13, 2014
SC seawall ban crumbling as landowners seek help
Posted: May 8, 2014
Debordieu scores win
Posted: May 8, 2014
SC seawalls, beach projects score victory
Posted: May 8, 2014
SC Supreme Court hears arguments in York County landfill suit
Posted: May 6, 2014
Senators side with gated Debordieu community in debate over public beach
Posted: Apr 29, 2014
SC has not yet reapplied for federal cruise permit
Posted: Apr 28, 2014
Group appeals judge's ruling over Charleston cruise terminal
Posted: Apr 22, 2014
DHEC holds community meeting to discuss jellyballs
Posted: Apr 22, 2014
Proposed industrial park in Bucksport pits environmentalists against developers, neighbor against neighbor
Posted: Apr 14, 2014
Resort’s troubles threaten to erode SC beach law
Posted: Mar 28, 2014
Waccamaw River: Industrial park raises debate over jobs and environment By Jason Lesley
Posted: Mar 13, 2014
SCELP won a critical VICTORY in the SC Supreme Court
Posted: Mar 12, 2014
Business leaders, environmentalists and residents debate marine industrial park at hearing
Posted: Mar 11, 2014
Environmentalists want Bucksport industrial park put on hold, proponents say it’s not necessary
Posted: Mar 10, 2014
Environmentalists raise concerns, proponents tout benefits of Bucksport Marina Industrial Park
Posted: Feb 18, 2014
Saving the Angel Oak
Posted: Feb 17, 2014
Tom Rice legislation could give gated Inlet Harbour community access to federal funds
Posted: Feb 17, 2014
Barnwell nuclear waste dump: Are open pits a threat?
Posted: Feb 6, 2014
SCELP argues before Court of Appeals for more containment at Barnwell nuclear site
Posted: Feb 5, 2014
Leaks at Barnwell Nuclear Dump Focus of Court Hearing
Posted: Feb 3, 2014
Court to hear Barnwell waste disposal appeal
Posted: Jan 23, 2014
Pawleys Island: State tries to avoid county default on groin permit
Posted: Jan 13, 2014
Funds drying up to check for toxic leaks near Lake Marion
Posted: Jan 8, 2014
4 years on, Charleston cruise debate lingers
Posted: Jan 6, 2014
DHEC Holds Public Hearing
Posted: Nov 19, 2013
Posted: Nov 19, 2013
Pawleys Island: County conspicuous in absence from court in groin appeal
Posted: Nov 15, 2013
Cruise terminal opponents want SC permit tossed
Posted: Nov 14, 2013
Environmentalists take a walk on the 'Wild Side' for law project fundraiser
Posted: Nov 10, 2013
Capt. Sam's Spit development could imperil little-regarded marsh turtle on Kiawah Island Bo Petersen
Posted: Oct 7, 2013
A Grass-Roots Rally To Protect South Carolina's Massive 'Angel Oak'
Posted: Oct 4, 2013
WMBF News Interviews Amy Armstrong
Posted: Sep 24, 2013
Pawleys Island: Town takes over county effort to get groin permit
Posted: Jun 4, 2013
S.C. Supreme Court to rehear Capt. Sam’s Spit case
Posted: May 3, 2013
Developers say Capt. Sam’s Spit homes won’t disrupt park or habitat; others disagree
Posted: Apr 28, 2013
Public calls for coal ash to be hauled away from Conway's Grainger plant
Posted: Apr 23, 2013
Pawleys Island: Town may defend county’s permit for south end groin
Posted: Apr 4, 2013
Kiawah River erosion clips Beachwalker Park parking lot; environmentalists ask for new Capt. Sam’s Spit hearing
Posted: Mar 19, 2013
Proposed Wild Dunes beach erosion fix sparks concerns
Posted: Mar 5, 2013
A line in a lot of sand; Seabrook owner disputes re-cutting Capt. Sam’s Inlet
Posted: Feb 4, 2013
Council approves plans for Pawley's Island shopping center
Posted: Jan 9, 2013
Groups file appeal to halt permit for Charleston cruise terminal
Posted: Jan 4, 2013
Pawleys Plaza: Planners expect new proposal without big-box store
Posted: Dec 14, 2012
As state’s wetlands dwindle, South Carolina seeks new answer
Posted: Nov 26, 2012
SCELP's Amy Armstrong was recently featured on WIS TV.
Posted: Oct 15, 2012
County Planning staff recommends rezoning for Pawleys Plaza
Posted: Sep 21, 2012
Supreme Court Wetlands Ruling
Posted: Jun 1, 2012
Marlboro in Fierce Fight Against Landfill
Posted: Apr 1, 2012
Captain Sam's Ruling a Win!
Posted: Dec 2, 2011
Developer in Battle to Build Near Angel Oak
Posted: Nov 23, 2011
High Court Rules on Pawleys Island Land Fight
Posted: Jul 14, 2011
Fight on to Save Lily Pond Arcadia Lakes; residents oppose dredging
Posted: Mar 29, 2010
Conservationists applaud long-awaited decision
Posted: Feb 2, 2010
Appeal under way to allow Kiawah revetment
Posted: Dec 8, 2009
Developer's Claim Gets Hard Look
Posted: Dec 8, 2009
Judge Denies Landfill Permit
Posted: Nov 24, 2009
Critics Urge Changes in U.S. 601 Plan through Congaree National Park
Posted: Sep 9, 2009
Bill Marscher Tribute
Posted: Jan 31, 2008
Barnwell leaks worse than feared
Posted: Aug 19, 2007
Crusade inspired by refinery case
Posted: Jul 30, 2007
Underdog lawyer puts up good fight
Posted: Jul 29, 2007
Sand battle won't blow over
Posted: Jul 13, 2007
Citizens step up to the plate and hit one home in coastal protection case
Posted: Mar 9, 2007
Ex-senator liable in bridge lawsuit
Posted: Mar 6, 2007
Posted: Mar 5, 2007
Robert Ariail's Editorial Cartoon on Chem-Nuclear
Posted: Mar 4, 2007
NMB Opens Nature Park on Marsh
Posted: Jan 25, 2007
Congaree bridge permits delayed
Posted: Aug 11, 2006
Land-use plan update critical, say residents
Posted: Jul 24, 2006
Wetlands bill represents compromise
Posted: Mar 7, 2006
A chance to take part
Posted: May 24, 2005
With Lowe’s gone for the time being, what have we really accomplished?
Posted: May 22, 2005
Neighbors claim abuse of power
Posted: Oct 1, 2004
Judge fines bulkhead owner
Posted: Aug 28, 2004
Seminar discusses erosion
Posted: Apr 8, 2004
Sea wall can stay for now
Posted: Mar 10, 2004
Court urged to jettison sea-wall ban
Posted: Mar 7, 2004
State takes public remarks on DeBordieu sand solution
Posted: Jan 1, 2004
No Public Sand For DeBordieu
Posted: Nov 16, 2003
A Public Forum on Growth
Posted: Oct 1, 2002
Fire guts 100-year-old house
Posted: Aug 1, 2002
Students mark law's anniversary
Posted: Aug 1, 2002
No groins on beach, court says
Posted: Jun 18, 2001
Nature's Guardian
Posted: Dec 1, 2000
Waste dump closed
Posted: Sep 23, 2000