Beached Houses Is What You Get
Posted: October 10, 2018
As sea levels continue to rise, and our beaches continue to erode, it was only a matter of time before we would face the dilemma of beachfront houses becoming permanently stranded on the active beach.
SCELP has been working on issues impacting Harbor Island – a severely erosion threatened private gated community in Beaufort County – for the past several years. Our first case was a successful Endangered Species Act action seeking removal of plastic seawalls (Wave Dissipation Systems) from that beach, because the structures were blocking sea turtle nesting. Then, we represented the Coastal Conservation League in challenging a permit to locate a beach house entirely seaward of the jurisdictional baseline. That case resulted in a favorable settlement.
Earlier this year, we have now been contacted by the Harbor Island Owners Association (HIOA) regarding seven houses that are presently on the active beach below the mean high water mark on Harbor Island. Siding, appliance fixtures, wires, and broken levels of porches are falling from the structures onto the active beach. These seven houses are, obviously, uninhabitable due to inundation by seawater, and have now become obstructions and impediments on the public beach, i.e., the wet beach below mean high water, as well as a hazard to humans and marine life.
Deteriorating houses on the public beach are a threat to beachgoers and marine life alike. Siding, pipes, wires, appliances and other structural components are or will be slowly making their way into the ocean, potentially causing harm to people recreating in and on the beach, as well as marine life that may ingest these components. Moreover, the long-term implications of houses deteriorating on the beach and obstructing public use are significant, particularly given the fact that nearly all of SC’s beaches are eroding while sea levels are rising.
On September 21, we formally asked the Attorney General to commence an action for removal of the seven houses (you can read our letter below). The state could do take action by either (1) issuing removal orders to the homeowners or (2) removing the houses and then seeking to recover the removal costs from the owners; but to date it hasn't done either.
With this initiative we aim at establishing a new and very significant precedent: the State’s mandatory duty to remove structures obstructing access to public trust resources and causing environmental harm to those resources. Such precedent would be extremely valuable in both the short and long term as not only we want to deter further bad choices on the part of homeowners, but also impress upon the State that the more of these houses it allows to be built too close to the ocean, the more they will be opening themselves up to exposure once those houses are on the active beach.